Thursday, May 1, 2025

The crucial role of security and compliance in the cannabis industry

The expanding cannabis market presents unique opportunities but also comes with challenges in the realms of security and compliance.

The cannabis industry is experiencing exponential growth as more regions legalize its use for both medicinal and recreational purposes. This expanding market presents unique opportunities but also comes with unique challenges in the realms of security and compliance.

Compliance and security in the cannabis industry, while closely related, address different aspects of operational integrity. Compliance focuses on adhering to local and state regulations to ensure legal and safe production and distribution, whereas security involves protecting the physical and digital assets of the business (including inventory, cash and personnel) from theft, diversion and cyber threats.

Unique security challenges

Gone are the days of carrying backpacks full of cash to pay licensing fees and other obligations (yes, that really happened), but safety concerns surrounding cash transactions, product transport, and foremost, the safety of staff, remain paramount.

  • High-value inventory: Cannabis products, both in raw and processed forms, are highly valuable, not just monetarily, but also from a possession perspective. Carry limits are in place so that no one individual has access or control of large amounts of inventory with the intent to sell to minors or undeveloped markets. This makes them attractive targets for theft and diversion to be distributed in what is called the “gray” market. 
  • Cash-intensive operations: Most operators have access to a bank of some sort for their business, but most transactions with consumers take place with cash. This means that security measures must be in place for handling and storing large amounts of cash. 
  • Employee safety: Cannabis businesses are subject to stringent regulatory oversight. These measures have laid the foundation to ensure necessary protocols are in place to protect employees from a variety of pitfalls or situations that exist as they work with cannabis and cash. 
  • Stringent oversight: Regulatory oversight has laid the foundation to ensure compliance and security protocols are in place. While some security measures may seem extreme, such as checking in every person who is accessing limited access facilities, escorting visitors, transport safety measures and more cameras than you can count, they are all necessary when working in the cannabis space. 


Implementing robust security measures

To address these challenges, cannabis businesses must implement comprehensive security strategies. Key components include physical security, employee training and cybersecurity.

Physical security encompasses surveillance systems, secure storage facilities, and stringent access controls. High-resolution cameras, alarm systems and reinforced vaults are essential to safeguard valuable inventory and cash reserves.

Additional safety measures come into play, even when hiring cannabis employees. Each state has its one set of rules for who can work in cannabis, but strict and repetitive background screens take place for every employee before someone can be trusted to work in cannabis. This helps weed out the bad actors.

Employee training is equally important. Employees must be trained to recognize and respond to security threats. This includes understanding protocols for handling cash, managing inventory and ensuring the integrity of the supply chain. Regular training sessions ensure that all staff are up-to-date on the latest security practices and are equipped to handle potential threats.

In 2024, cybersecurity cannot be overlooked — or overstated. As with any modern business, cannabis companies must protect their digital assets along with environmental control systems that live in the cloud. This involves safeguarding customer data, securing online transactions and preventing cyberattacks or hacking into system databases.


The importance of compliance

Compliance in the cannabis industry is multifaceted, involving local and state rules. Key areas of focus include:

Licensing: Obtaining and maintaining the necessary licenses is fundamental to operating a legal cannabis business. This process can be complex and requires meticulous attention to detail. Businesses must navigate an evolving regulatory landscape, submit comprehensive documentation and often undergo rigorous inspections. The cost of non-compliance can be severe, including hefty fines, license suspension or permanent closure.

Product testing and labeling: Product testing and labeling are critical components of compliance. Cannabis products must meet stringent safety standards to ensure they are free from contaminants such as pesticides, heavy metals and microbial impurities. Accurate labeling is equally important, providing consumers with essential information about the product's potency, ingredients and usage instructions. This transparency helps build consumer trust and ensures safety for products that hit the store shelves.

Record-keeping: Detailed records must be kept for all aspects of the business, from seed to sale. Traceability and accountability become paramount when a product is recalled or needs to be investigated for product safety.


Building a company culture of compliance

Creating a culture within a cannabis organization requires commitment from all levels of the business. Compliance and security are everyone's jobs! Senior management must lead by example, while all employees need to embrace the importance of compliance. Regular training sessions and clear communication of policies are essential. Additionally, this is not a one-time effort but an ongoing process. Businesses must stay abreast of changing regulations and continuously refine their practices — rules can change overnight to be implemented the next day.


Partnering with experts

Given the complexities of security and compliance, partnering with experts can be invaluable. Security consultants, legal advisors and compliance specialists can provide the insights and support needed to navigate the regulatory landscape and implement effective security measures.

The cannabis industry is at a critical juncture, with enormous potential for growth and innovation. However, the risks associated with security and compliance should not be underestimated. The adage “You're only as strong as your weakest link” is particularly relevant in the cannabis industry. It is critical to build a company-wide culture of compliance and security, ensuring that every member of the organization is aware of their role in maintaining these standards. By prioritizing these aspects, businesses can not only protect their assets and reputation but also build a foundation for long-term success.



Thursday, April 17, 2025

Cannabis businesses in metro Detroit are getting robbed, smashed, and left to fend for themselves. By Steve Neavling Apr 16, 2025

(As a Security Professional for the last whatever years. It has always been in my mind with companies that they need to pay, and train Armed Security Officers. Or, hire Off Duty Police Officers or Public Safety. Cameras are pretty effective if a criminal gave a care, but they don't. What is needed is feet on the ground with their hands on the trigger, 24/7. 365 days a year. Detroit could learn something from Las Vegas, NV dispensaries and grow houses. Everyone is armed and cameras are everywhere. Or, keep losing money. There is nothing difficult about making policies for Armed Security Officers which means extensive training on the laws and using a weapon appropriately. If they don't, expect to see a lot of closed doors.)

The wave of break-ins comes at a time when Michigan’s cannabis market is struggling.


Update: After this story went to press, another cannabis business was targeted.

The calls almost always come in the dead of night.

For George Brikho, owner of Jazz Cannabis Club on Detroit’s west side, it’s become a nerve-racking routine — the blare of a security alarm, the heart-pounding scramble for firearms, and the frantic race toward a dispensary 28 miles away that is already under siege. “Your heart sinks. You’re grabbing your clothes, trying to get dressed,” Brikho tells Metro Times. “I’m grabbing my rifle and my pistol, and I’m driving, and I just got the hell scared out of me, and all of that anxiety is for nothing. The mindfuck – it’s traumatic. I have anxiety attacks. I say, ‘George, calm the fuck down.’ But you can’t. Your unconscious mind goes into fight or flight mode.”

Jazz Cannabis Club has been broken into three times in the past year, with each hit more brazen than the last. A year ago, thieves used sledgehammers to punch through a wall. In December, a stolen U-Haul was smashed into the rear of the building. In March, burglars ripped the front door off with a pickup truck.

All told, Brikho says he’s lost around $100,000 in cannabis products, and that’s not counting the repeated damage to his building.

He’s far from alone.

Since January 2024, at least 53 cannabis businesses in Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb counties have been burglarized, according to records obtained under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and interviews with cannabis business owners. Of those, 40 were in Detroit. Hazel Park has been hit hard too, with at least six break-ins, making it the second hardest-hit city in the region. The tactics are growing more aggressive.

In the first three months of this year alone, at least 22 cannabis businesses were burglarized — 16 of them in Detroit. In about half of those, thieves used trucks to smash through buildings. Most got away.

Between Jan. 11 and Jan. 24, six grow facilities on Detroit’s west side were hit in rapid succession — some just blocks apart — causing hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage. The latest break-in occurred overnight on Sunday at Epic Gardens on Detroit’s west side, where a truck plowed through a fence and then into the building.

The true number of break-ins is likely even higher. Metro Times filed a FOIA request with the state Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA), which requires licensed marijuana businesses to report any thefts or criminal activity. The agency initially provided records for about 12 break-ins since January 2023. After we pointed out numerous missing cases, the CRA sent a second, more complete response, showing about 30 break-ins. Through additional interviews and incident reports, Metro Times identified more than 20 others, raising questions about the state’s recordkeeping at a time when the industry is desperate for accurate data and solutions.

Asked to explain the discrepancy, a CRA spokesperson says the first omission was an error but he wasn’t sure why reports from additional break-ins weren’t disclosed. He says some records may not have been divulged because there was no stolen product during the break-in. The CRA offered to try to identify any missing records, but it was past our deadline.

A growing threat to a troubled market

The wave of break-ins comes at a time when Michigan’s cannabis market is struggling. Due to high supply, wholesale prices have collapsed with pounds of marijuana sometimes selling for less than $600, a fraction of what it fetched just three years ago. As a result, many operators are delaying security upgrades, laying off staff, or closing altogether.

Now thieves are making a bad situation worse, but in an unfortunate twist for them, they’re often leaving empty-handed or with a few garbage bags full of trim, which has an exceedingly low street value.

Left behind is the damage: gaping holes in the sides of recently renovated buildings.

“They’re doing a lot for very little,” says Jason Wilson, owner of Uncle J’s Joints on Detroit’s west side. “The street prices are way down. It doesn’t make any sense.”

His business has been hit three times in the past year, each time by burglars sending a truck barreling through his gates. One of those trucks smashed through three separate barriers before reaching the garage doors. The thieves made off with about 60 plants — roughly 25 pounds of flower. But the cost of repairs and damage? Close to $100,000.

“I think it’s going to get worse,” Wilson adds. “I hate to say it and think it. But as the economy gets worse, there are going to be a lot more break-ins based on that.”

Even when thieves walk away empty-handed, the consequences can be severe. At Granny Farm, a family-run grow facility on Detroit’s east side, burglars used a sledgehammer or similar tool to punch a hole into the building last May. A neighbor chased them off, but they returned two hours later with a U-Haul. Police responded around 4 a.m. and caught the thieves in the act, but the damage was already done.

“We got the product back, but it was compromised and couldn’t pass testing,” says co-owner Joanne Manning. “We lost way more money than we thought. Even though they didn’t get away with anything, it still cost us a lot.” To make matters worse, Manning says the break-in let in pests that destroyed the next harvests. She briefly considered quitting. Instead, she enrolled in Project Green Light, Detroit’s real-time camera surveillance program.

“Green Light is quite expensive, but at this point we understand it’s a huge deterrent,” she says. “We have to continue to be proactive.”

The Refinery in Detroit is another dispensary that has been robbed recently. - Steve Neavling
Steve Neavling
The Refinery in Detroit is another dispensary that has been robbed recently.

A patchwork of protection

Security upgrades have become an expensive necessity.

The cost to fully fortify a dispensary or cultivation site can be anywhere from $25,000 to $50,000, not including monthly spending on surveillance systems, private security, and overnight staff, cannabis operators say.

For some, it still hasn’t been enough.

“I’ve basically built a bunker and still got hit,” Brikho says. “And good luck getting insurance unless you’ve built your place like a bank.”

State regulations require cannabis businesses to install commercial-grade security doors, alarms, and a surveillance system with at least 30 days of video storage. But enforcement and protection fall on local police, not the state. With break-ins on the rise, companies that make metal doors, steel shutters, and concrete barriers are seeing a surge in demand. At Detroit Door Services, owner Nadav (David) Frieder says cannabis businesses are increasingly reaching out, but often after they’ve already been hit. He recently installed hollow metal doors and steel frames at a grow facility that had been burglarized twice in Detroit. For dispensaries with windows, he recommends adding metal shutters.

“There are a lot of break-ins,” Frieder says. “It’s crazy.”

Still, most clients call him too late.

“Nobody wants to spend money until something bad happens,” he says. “Things are already expensive, so they aren’t necessarily wanting to spend money.” But he urges business owners to act before it’s too late. “Time is the key,” Frieder says. “You want to make it as hard as possible to get in so it’s too much work to even mess with.” To keep thieves out, some cannabis businesses are fortifying their buildings with reinforced walls, steel doors, anti-ram barriers, and vault-style rooms to protect their businesses. “We joke that this place is turning into Fort Knox,” says James Rissi, head grower at M&T Ventures in Detroit. “We’re putting vault locks on everything.”

When the police don’t come

But all the steel and concrete in the world won’t help much if police don’t respond, and that’s where many operators say the system is breaking down.Rissi’s grow operation was burglarized twice in one week in February. After the first incident, he says he handed Detroit police a license plate number, surveillance footage, and even a crowbar left behind by the burglars. No one followed up, he says. Days later, the thieves returned and struck again.

“The police have done absolutely nothing,” Rissi says. “It’s crazy out there. They’re hitting everything.” Then, at another Detroit building Rissi was preparing to open, thieves broke in and stole 84 high-end lights and most of the equipment he had already installed. “That’s an all-nighter,” Rissi says of the heist. “And we still haven’t heard from the police.” 

He’s not the only one frustrated. One Detroit cultivator, who asked not to be named for fear of being targeted again, says his business was hit twice in two months. The first time, the thieves failed to get inside. The second time, they used a truck to ram through a steel door in search of cannabis. “We felt very defenseless,” he says. “They’re stealing vehicles and using disguises. You feel a bit helpless about it.” After filing a report, he says police gave him the wrong case number, then stopped returning his calls. He tried enrolling in Project Green Light, the city’s surveillance program, but no one followed up.

“They don’t care,” he says. “They just don’t care.”

At least four other business owners repeated the same complaint: Detectives never called them back after the break-ins. “It’s like the system’s overloaded or just not interested,” says one dispensary manager who asked not to be named. Detroit police, however, say they are taking the break-ins seriously.

“We do hope there will be a break in some of these,” says Anthony O’Rourke, commander of organized crime for the Detroit Police Department. “I tend to believe it’s a smaller group of people doing a majority of these locations.”

He says the department is using surveillance technology to identify and catch suspects, and that police regularly audit their own work to ensure cases are being properly investigated.

“It doesn’t mean we are a perfect organization,” O’Rourke says. “Probably some things have fallen through the cracks. But we have mechanisms in place to minimize that.” O’Rourke adds that some cannabis businesses may not be cooperating because they are operating outside the law and are hesitant to share surveillance footage or internal documentation. (Metro Times has not come across an owner who said they declined to cooperate with police.)

“From a logical standpoint, if you have that much value in that location, what are you doing to solve the problem of security?” he says. “We don’t have cars driving through banks.”

O’Rourke also points to Detroit’s still-thriving black market as a major incentive for burglars.

“This is a money-driven product,” he says. “There is a huge black market based on the difference in prices. The cost of the legalized market is significantly higher than the black market. So there is some motive for these guys to get these very profitable products. The black market is definitely out there, alive and well, and has probably grown since the legalization and decriminalization in the state of Michigan.”

Project Green Light: Help or hurdle?

Some cannabis business owners are turning to Project Green Light, the city’s widely touted public-private surveillance partnership. Businesses that enroll are connected to Detroit police through live high-definition video feeds. They’re also promised priority response when crimes are reported. But that protection doesn’t come cheap.

According to city data, enrollment costs up to $4,100 for installation and cameras, plus another $1,000 for signs and green lights, and monthly fees between $100 and $200.

And only a small fraction of Detroit cannabis businesses are enrolled — just 9 out of roughly 70 licensed locations.

Some operators have hope in the program. After thieves struck Granny Farm twice last year, co-owner Manning applauds DPD’s efforts but says more can be done.

“We want to know if there’s something more the Detroit Police Department can do to keep us a little more protected,” Manning says. “The burglars are still at it.”

The burglary tactics have become more destructive, more deliberate — and more surreal.

At The Refinery, a dispensary on Detroit’s west side, security cameras first caught someone jumping a fence. Hours later, the footage showed a group cutting through a concrete wall from a neighboring property. Nearly two hours later, they passed racks of cannabis through the hole like contraband in a prison break.

At Liberty Cannabis, one crew rammed a truck through the wall. A few months later, masked suspects used crowbars to try to pry open the front door.

And at Supergood, a newly opened dispensary, burglars used a dumpster for cover, then sawed through the back wall. Another crew returned days later and used what appeared to be a branch trimmer to sever the store’s internet connection before slipping inside. They left with bags of flower — and left behind thousands of dollars in damage.

Similar scenes have played out in Hazel Park, Warren, and Ferndale, where stolen pickup trucks, U-Hauls, and minivans have become battering rams. Many thieves come equipped with crowbars, grinders, bolt cutters, and often seem to know exactly where to go once inside.

In Warren, a one-week stretch in February was particularly wild. A truck plowed through three separate cultivation and processing facilities, causing significant damage and making off with large amounts of cannabis.

In the second incident, a truck slammed into the garage of a facility on Dequindre Road. Two thieves ran inside, grabbed bins and bags of marijuana flower, and took off. Police later spotted the vehicle and attempted a traffic stop, but the truck sped off.

The chase ended in Detroit’s west side when the driver, 29-year-old parole absconder Dijon Tyree, lost control and crashed into a vacant house

Two days later, while Tyree was in jail awaiting arraignment, an SUV crashed into another cannabis processing plant just a block away from the previous hit. The thieves got away clean, again.

Scenes like this have turned metro Detroit’s cannabis market into something closer to a crash-and-grab battleground — where police chases, repeated hits, and empty responses are becoming all too common. And despite the scale of the damage, they’re often stealing only small quantities — trim, pre-rolls, or a few pounds of flower. In many cases, the cost of the damage far exceeds the value of what’s stolen.

The CRA’s role and its limits

The Cannabis Regulatory Agency says it’s trying to help, but it has limited tools.

“We’ve issued bulletins to warn businesses,” CRA executive director Brian Hanna tells Metro Times. “We view this as, ‘We’re all in this together.’” But the agency can’t redirect cannabis tax dollars to help patrol or protect businesses because that would require legislation, Hanna says.

“If people are talking about reallocating tax dollars for this kind of issue, they need to talk to lawmakers,” Hanna says. “We don’t have the authority to dictate where the money goes.” He agrees the industry’s heavy reliance on cash, which is a consequence of federal banking restrictions against cannabis companies, creates an additional layer of risk. “We have been calling on banking reforms because this is an all-cash business,” Hanna says. “It’s an inherent danger to the industry to operate like this.” Some cannabis operators also take issue with the CRA’s online public licensee directory, which lists the names and addresses of every licensed marijuana business in the state.

They say it’s making them easy targets.

“I don’t understand why they have to put all that information up,” says Jason Wilson, owner of Uncle J’s Joints. “In California, they kept grow locations secret because they knew these things would happen.” Others in the industry say the directory helps them network, share contacts, and build wholesale partnerships, and transparency advocates say the public has a right to know where these businesses are located. But some suggest a compromise: restrict the full address list to licensed operators and trade members only. “It would be nice if this information wasn’t just out there for anyone to use, especially people trying to rob us,” one grower says.

A city organizing to fight back

After enduring four break-ins at his dispensary and cultivation sites, Stuart Carter, owner of Utopia Gardens, decided it was time for cannabis businesses to stop acting alone.

This spring, he launched the Detroit Cannabis Industry Association, a 501(c)(6) nonprofit trade group that aims to bring together cultivators, processors, and retailers across the city to share intelligence, push for policy changes, and develop security strategies.

“I’m extremely concerned about the future of the cannabis industry, particularly in Detroit,” Carter says. “Let’s band together. Let’s share strategies. My goal is to make it too hard for thieves to break into our buildings.”

Carter envisions the association as a way to coordinate responses to break-ins, pool ideas for fortifying buildings, and advocate as a unified voice.

But Carter says that even with smart planning, survival is getting harder. With prices plummeting, operators can’t afford thousands of dollars in repairs, let alone major security overhauls.

“We need affordable solutions,” he says. “Not every operator has $50,000 to spend on fortifying a building. But if we share what works — what slows them down, what stops them — we’ve got a better chance.”

The association also hopes to lobby city officials for support, including increased patrols in burglary hotspots and more cooperation with state agencies. But even with every camera installed, every gate reinforced, and every door locked down, business owners say the break-ins haven’t stopped. And neither has the anxiety.

Before bed, Brikho says, he braces for the sound of his phone ringing. “When I close my eyes at night, I’m just waiting for that call,” he says. “Every single night.” And yet, he hasn’t walked away. Like many others in the industry, he’s still fighting and opening the doors every day, hoping it won’t be his turn again.

“This is weed we’re talking about. We joke that it’s just that good,” Brikho says. “But the truth is, it’s our livelihood. And we’re not going anywhere.”

Saturday, March 1, 2025

"Legal Challenges Limit Security Officers’ Authority"

This report just caught my eye after all these years. 

Why? 

I currently work part time at a Apple store in Toledo.The Security company from California has a contract with all the Apple stores across the country. When clocking in on the app for the start of your shift, you have to electronically sign a contract (reminder) to not EVER touch, chase, detain a shoplifter. That's right. You do nothing. Don't even think about accusing a person for shoplifting and be completely wrong about what you saw. All you can do as a Security Officer is get a Manager. Tell them quickly, and let them handle it. You stand by closely to listen. If more action is needed, they will tell you. Then, you can handle it to the best of your ability. I've always tell newbies. Security Officers are always left on your own. There is no support for the job that you do for them. Following their rules. Nuthin'! I've witnessed guys followed the rules to the letter. Both, the client, and Security company fired him and wouldn't assist with legal issues. Following their rules. Protecting their property and people. You're fucked. Which is why, if someone robs the place I will open the door for them to "have at it".


Legal Challenges Limit Security Officers’ Authority

​Picture a security officer on duty at a Class A office building in the United States. An agitated man enters the building, approaches the reception desk, and demands to speak with human resources, refusing to leave until an HR professional comes down to the lobby to explain why he was not hired. 

The security officer approaches, flashes his badge at the visitor, and tells him that if he does not leave in the next five minutes, the guard will arrest him. While the guard’s action may be well-intentioned, it can put the officer—and the company—at legal risk.

 “Unfortunately, the law is not always kind to those who are—in their judgment—trying to do the best thing or the right thing based on an emergency or threat situation,” says Tod Stephens, an industrial security attorney with Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, a law firm headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. “Even the best intentions in trying to protect an employee or a visitor from an emergency or threat situation can later be misconstrued into an unwanted touching or unwanted confinement, which can lead later to either criminal or civil litigation against the security officer or guard.” 

While the image and authorities for guard services can vary country to country, the use of police-like uniforms and badging for U.S. guard services and the authoritative tone guards may take when issuing instructions during an emergency can later lead to allegations that the guard was impersonating a police officer, Stephens says. Those claims can become especially serious when the instructions issued by the guard result in injury or loss of property. 

“Police impersonation certainly has been a problem since private security was conceived of, and a lot of that can occur because of the resemblance to a police officer in the public’s eye and not having a good understanding of what their limitations are,” says Eddie Sorrells, CPP, PCI, PSP, chief operating officer and general counsel for DSI Security Services.

 

He adds that security officers usually do not intentionally overstate their legal level of authority; however, in their efforts to protect people, property, and assets, they sometimes push the envelope of what is acceptable.

And some guards may intentionally abuse this perception. Sorrells cites one case where security officers pursued a shoplifting suspect two miles off property and then interrogated him about the theft. 

“That is certainly overstepping their bounds,” he says. “Whether or not they identified themselves as police officers, they certainly were holding themselves out as having some authority to require that person to stay there and answer questions.” If the suspect asks if he or she is allowed to leave and the guard says “no” or blocks his or her way, this produces another legal challenge—false arrest or false detainment. 

“The civil action of false imprisonment or confinement will be defined differently in different jurisdictions,” Stephens says. False imprisonment and false confinement are generally considered acts that involve a person—or organization—instructing another person under threat of force or punishment to not leave an area.    

 

“Sometimes people make the mistake of thinking an allegation of false imprisonment or confinement can only happen when an organization or a security guard puts someone in a makeshift jail—like a locked room—or handcuffs an individual to a railing at a mall,” Stephens explains. “However, in many jurisdictions across the country, allegations can arise when a security guard or officer simply instructs an individual that they are not allowed to leave the premises under threat of some type of punishment.” 

“In most situations, security guards have the same ability as private citizens to detain someone for a crime they believe has been committed,” he says. 

In most jurisdictions, this means that if the guard witnesses or has a reasonable belief that a person committed a felony, he or she can detain that person until law enforcement personnel arrive. But what is considered reasonable varies from case to case.

False detainment claims crop up frequently in the retail space around shoplifting, which is why insurers are leery of underwriting guard companies that do a lot of work in this industry, says Tory Brownyard, president of the Brownyard Group, an insurer for security guard firms. Shoplifting claims are “not usually very serious claims, but they’re generally more nuisance claims that result in significant legal expenses” because the guard firm must defend itself, he says. “From a risk analysis standpoint, if we see a company doing a lot of retail security, we want to make sure the officers are more ‘observe and report’ and not detaining people to try to limit the liability on those incidents.” 

It can be difficult to draw the line between what a reasonable person would construe as being free to leave or not. Being asked to come into a facility, brought up to the third floor, and placed in a room with a closed door could imply that the individual is being detained, even if the door is not locked, Sorrells says. It can be valuable to clearly inform the person in question that they are free to go anytime and to have another person present to observe any interviews to keep an accurate record of the proceedings.

 Stephens recommends training security personnel to never instruct an employee or visitor that they are prohibited from leaving the premises. 

“That on its face doesn’t seem like a good security practice,” he acknowledges. “For example, an employee or a visitor to the facility could walk out the front door with stolen merchandise or stolen property. However, the legal risk of restraining or confining a person—even when they are possessing stolen property—usually outweighs the value of that stolen property.” 

Instead, Stephens says having good working relationships with local police departments will enable guards to report a suspected theft and have law enforcement promptly take over the investigation. 

“That is not to say that the law does not afford the property owner the ability to temporarily detain someone suspected of stealing property from the premises; however, the legal risk rapidly increases every minute a security officer or guard attempts to detain an individual without having the authority of law—that is, being a police officer, for example,” he says. 

From a legal perspective, the more physically involved the security officer was in the incident, the greater the risk to the company that employs him or her.

 It’s a constant tension between the guard company protecting its own interests and the interests of its client, as well as the law’s affording significant protections for individuals to be safe from being accosted by others or having their personal property taken without due process, Stephens adds.

When navigating that tension, appropriate training is essential to ensure that officers are aware of their rights, their limitations, and any situations that may be unique to their assignments. For example, Brownyard says a security officer assigned to guard a hospital emergency room should be well versed in de-escalation techniques and how to handle patients and visitors under the influence of drugs or alcohol. 

In general, “every security officer should be well trained on what are the powers to arrest, how to de-escalate situations, and what kind of deadly force should be used,” Sorrells says. “We do monthly or quarterly training when we address these issues, as well as patrol techniques and how to use technologies, but we also refresh and remind the officers of their rights, their obligations, and their restrictions.”  

There has been a rise in people who attempt to bait or test security personnel, including “First Amendment auditors” who quiz security officers on camera about their legal rights and limitations, underlining the need for officers to know where their limits are—and be able to de-escalate antagonistic situations, Sorrells says. 

​In February 2019, for example, a security guard protecting a synagogue in Los Angeles shot a First Amendment auditor standing on the public sidewalk after she refused to stop filming and depart the area. The guard was arrested on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon, but charges were not filed by Los Angeles prosecutors. The protester, on the other hand, filed a civil lawsuit against the guard and his employer.  

“You have a lot of people attempting to test security, for whatever reason, and trying to escalate situations to try and see if that security officer will step over the line, so use of force is certainly a big issue as well,” Sorrells adds. 

When it comes to use of force, “the officer is no different from a private citizen—they are confined to using only the force that is necessary to repel an attack or to protect their life or someone else’s life,” Sorrells says. “Responding to nonlethal situations with lethal force can be a problem, and of course security officers can be criminally liable for that and even civilly liable.” 

One training method that does not work, says Stephens, is extensive written policies, which are often handed out at new hire orientation and then rarely reviewed. Instead, he counsels organizations to conduct annual in-person security training using vignettes or situational training. For example, a guard would be asked to respond to a hypothetical situation where a visitor reports a weapon in the backseat of a vehicle on company property, or an employee reports receiving threatening text messages from an ex-spouse while at work. 

The instructor—a legal expert or trained security professional—can provide feedback and discuss the guard’s response with the rest of the group, sharing guidance on how recent changes to laws should affect the guard’s response to an incident and how to eliminate risks generated by the individual’s response. 

This type of training enables the guard force to understand and apply legal updates more swiftly and effectively than if the changes were simply added to the written procedures manual. 

 

Learn more about legal challenges security professionals face with the Law & Ethics track at GSX this month. Tod Stephens of Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, will present a session, “Five Ways Security Managers Can Get Sued” (session #6306) on Wednesday, 11 September. Find out more at gsx.org​.


Sunday, December 22, 2024

Stardate: 2412.21. Two suspects shot at trying to break into Mansion by Security

 Hope these Security Officers obtain a lawyer. If I know Security companies and HOA's that hire them as a 3rd party vendor. It is always the fault of Security, even if we are doing our job. Follow the rules they give you, and they still fire you. Keep shooting Security by following the rules.

 

BEVERLY CREST, CA – A quiet night in a luxurious Beverly Crest neighborhood was shattered by gunfire after an attempted burglary at a multi-million dollar mansion. The incident occurred in a gated community on Summit Ridge Drive, not far from the renowned Holland Drive.

According to the Los Angeles Police Department, a security guard stationed at the property confronted two armed suspects who were attempting to break into the mansion. In a swift response, the guard discharged his firearm, prompting the suspects to flee the scene. Fortunately, neither suspect was hit by the gunfire.

The police quickly arrived on the scene, initiating a search for the suspects in the surrounding area. One of the suspects was eventually located with the help of a police dog, which had bitten him during the pursuit. The suspect received medical attention before being taken into custody.

Residents of the affluent neighborhood expressed concern over the incident, noting that such occurrences are rare in their community. “It’s unsettling to think something like this could happen so close to home,” said one resident who wished to remain anonymous.

Law enforcement officials have increased patrols in the area as a precautionary measure. The investigation into the attempted burglary is ongoing, with detectives working to determine the identities of both suspects and any potential connections to other crimes in the region.

The mansion, known for its impressive architecture and high-profile residents, has been a symbol of luxury in Beverly Crest for years. This incident has raised questions about security measures in place for such properties and whether additional steps are needed to ensure the safety of residents.

As the investigation continues, authorities are urging anyone with information about the incident to come forward. They believe that community cooperation will be crucial in apprehending the second suspect and preventing future crimes in the area.

The incident has sparked a broader discussion about crime in affluent neighborhoods and the measures homeowners can take to protect their properties. While the security guard’s actions prevented the burglary, the event serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities even the most secure communities can face.

 

 

 

Thursday, October 20, 2022

Security guarding in the future: Robocop meets sensor integration. Organizations will look to technology to help augment the jobs of security officers, while boosting efficiency, safety and security.

 Security guarding in the future: Robocop meets sensor integration

 Science fiction in novels and media has a proven track record of predicting future technology advances to fight crime and secure the public. Today, the convergence of physical security, IT infrastructure and cyber is commonplace. The old silos and proprietary solutions are giving way to open architectures, including hybrid and Cloud services, to evolve security from reactive and responsive solutions to predictive and proactive platforms. 

Innovative firms are merging the resources of electronic security teams and physical guarding services to redefine the future of the security industry. The most recent example being the merger of two great companies, Stanley Security into Securitas Technology. 

A transformation case in point is the security guard, perhaps the “most physical” example in the physical security industry. Private protection services date back to the ancient Romans and over the preceding millennium the industry growth has been global and across all sectors. While the physical guard position itself will always remain a centerpiece of the industry, the integration of intelligent sensor technologies will make the old “snoozing” guard caricature history. 

The new model leverages real time intelligence from end points to machine learning algorithms across data lakes, to provide real time decision making and predictive analytics. The next generation of guarding services integrates multiple technologies to improve margins. That is the execution phase.

The rationale for this evolution includes not only technical advances but physical supply. Hiring and retaining competent guarding personnel is difficult, time consuming, and expensive.

Adjacent to the guarding problem is a law enforcement community with record levels or early retirements and the worst recruitment numbers in decades. Rising crime rates are a national emergency in many U.S. cities. Guarding is in demand.

Robots and drones will augment guards at an increasing rate for performing mundane tasks, while providing improved coverage models and profits. The integration of sensor technologies extends guarding performance to new levels while multiplying physical scale as a principal requirement.

Robotics (think fido bomb detectors) and drones (internal and external) patrolling indoors as well as outdoors 24x7x365 into areas where humans are not a fit (physically) or activities are simply too dangerous. Mobile drone patrols can track suspects on foot and in vehicles, while assisting or eliminating dangerous chases. The return on investment (ROI) of drones over manned patrols is compelling, as well as much safer. 

Vison Intelligence will evolve to provide 100% accuracy in facial and vehicle recognition applications across all environments, effectively countering public opposition in favor of proven technical advancements. These technology integrations will also become mobile and embedded into wearable uniforms. Miniature sensors and real time language translation will complement body cameras. 

Integration to G-SOC monitoring will make real time guarding decisions second nature as drones augment security patrols with updated intelligence feeds, incident reporting and Google maps to search for lost individuals or respond to medical emergencies. Integration into existing guard force software will be commonplace and provide new high value services for their customers.

Intrusion detection will evolve from door and window sensor breaches alerting a monitoring center and dispatching guards, to creating an invisible trip wire boundary in the sky. Innovative guard forces will pivot aggressively to service this new niche market to secure low altitude airspace and counter unauthorized drones “as a service”.  Laggards will simply watch as the quadcopter drone threats to people, property, and information assets simply fly over their heads, as well as the line of sight of camera systems. 

The security guarding professional of the future is evolving today at global companies like Securitas Technology, Allied Universal, and Prosegur, to name a few. The new model combines physical guarding, electronic systems, and sensors focused on continuously improving security as a service.

Robocop Redux (Revived) has evolved to be sensor centric and the future of guarding is changing forever, and quickly for the winners who capitalize on the industry transition.

 

 

 

Tuesday, September 27, 2022

OSHA administers $11.7m in grants for workplace safety By Security Staff

Why aren't the security teams that I know aren't seeing any of this money? Read this thing...

 

 

The U.S. Department of Labor announced the award of $11,746,992, in grants to support worker and employer education to make workplaces around the nation safer and healthier.

Administered by the department's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program is making grants to 90 nonprofit organizations in fiscal year 2022 for education and training on hazard recognition and injury prevention, workers' rights, and employers' legal responsibilities to provide safe and healthful workplaces.

 

Named for late Susan Harwood, former director of OSHA's Office of Risk Assessment, the grants are awarded in the Targeted Topic Training, Training and Educational Materials Development, and Capacity Building categories. During her 17 years with OSHA, Dr. Harwood helped develop federal standards to protect workers from bloodborne pathogens, cotton dust, benzene, formaldehyde, asbestos and lead in construction.

OSHA grants are awarded to non-profit organizations, including community and faith-based groups, employer associations, labor unions, joint labor-management associations, Native American tribes, and local and state-sponsored colleges and universities. Target trainees include small-business employers and underserved vulnerable workers in high-hazard industries.

Access control considerations for healthcare settings.

 Here is a situation with all hospitals since the pandemic started. The good and bad of it all involving Security. Remember, "Security doesn't make money for companies. They spend money." Check this article out.


92% of U.S. hospitals use electronic access control to some extent, representing a 13% increase since 2016. 

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of security technologies and touchless solutions, according to the 2022 Health Care Trends Report from Allegion. The report surveyed 100 decision makers from across leading U.S. health systems. 

COVID-19's effect on hospital security

Beyond PPE and touchless access control, the study unveiled how COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of new security and safety measures aimed at protecting people and physical assets. Many strategic initiatives around door hardware and access control have been adopted since the pandemic, according to the report.

  • 73% added extra layers of security to limit the spread of infection while protecting people and property.
  • 59% added touchless technology at openings and 62% electrified openings with access control.
  • 61% are using hands-free or touchless access products more than before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Electronic access control adoption

Adoption escalated throughout the healthcare market over the last five years, especially among larger facilities located in urban and suburban markets, according to the report. Common areas with electronic door hardware in place include surgical suites, nurseries, behavioral health units and equipment rooms.

  • Of those using connected systems in their facilities, 82% are using hardwired electronic access control products, and 71% are using wireless technologies.
  • Healthcare professionals cite cost (34%) and lack of budgets (28%) as primary barriers to widespread electronic access control adoption.

Patient accommodations in access control

Facilities have become more accommodating for patients of all abilities and needs. The pandemic and an increased focus on mental health are cited as key drivers for these shifts.

  • Over 80% of hospitals updated doors to meet ADA compliance over the last year.
  • Changing door knobs to levers (45%) and adding automatic door operators (44%) were the most common changes made in areas like patient rooms, common areas and restrooms.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      By Security Staff